Definition/General

Introduction:
-Gastric carcinoid tumors are well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) arising from gastric mucosa
-They represent 2-3% of all gastric neoplasms
-Classified into three distinct types based on pathogenesis and clinical behavior
-They have variable malignant potential depending on type and size.
Origin:
-Arise from enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells in gastric mucosa
-These cells are located in the gastric fundus and body
-ECL cells produce histamine and are regulated by gastrin
-Chronic hypergastrinemia leads to ECL cell hyperplasia and eventual neoplasia.
Classification:
-Type I (75-80%): Associated with chronic atrophic gastritis and hypergastrinemia
-Type II (5-10%): Associated with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and MEN-1
-Type III (15-20%): Sporadic tumors without hypergastrinemia
-Each type has distinct clinical behavior and prognosis.
Epidemiology:
-Increasing incidence due to better recognition and endoscopic screening
-Female predominance in Type I (3:1 ratio)
-Mean age 50-60 years for Type I and II
-Type III occurs in older patients (60-70 years)
-Racial predilection varies by geographic location.

Clinical Features

Presentation:
-Asymptomatic in majority of Type I cases (incidental finding)
-Dyspepsia and epigastric pain (30-40%)
-Nausea and vomiting (20-30%)
-Carcinoid syndrome rare (<5% cases)
-Gastrointestinal bleeding in larger lesions
-Abdominal pain and weight loss in advanced cases.
Symptoms:
-Type I: Usually asymptomatic, symptoms related to underlying gastritis
-Type II: Peptic ulcer symptoms from gastrinoma
-Type III: Abdominal pain, weight loss, bleeding
-Carcinoid syndrome: Flushing, diarrhea, bronchospasm (rare)
-Carcinoid heart disease in advanced metastatic cases.
Risk Factors:
-Chronic atrophic gastritis (Type I)
-Pernicious anemia and vitamin B12 deficiency
-Helicobacter pylori infection
-MEN-1 syndrome (Type II)
-Zollinger-Ellison syndrome
-Family history of neuroendocrine tumors
-Advanced age for Type III.
Screening:
-Upper endoscopy with biopsy for suspicious lesions
-Serum gastrin levels (elevated in Type I and II)
-Chromogranin A serum levels
-24-hour urine 5-HIAA if carcinoid syndrome suspected
-Octreotide scintigraphy for staging
-CT/MRI for metastasis detection.

Master Carcinoid Tumor Pathology with RxDx

Access 100+ pathology videos and expert guidance with the RxDx app

Gross Description

Appearance:
-Type I: Multiple small (<1 cm) polypoid lesions in fundus/body
-Type II: Few small to moderate lesions (1-2 cm)
-Type III: Usually solitary large lesions (>2 cm)
-Surface may show ulceration in larger tumors.
Characteristics:
-Well-circumscribed nodules or polyps with smooth surface
-Yellow-tan cut surface with homogeneous appearance
-Firm consistency
-Submucosal location with mucosal elevation
-Larger lesions may show central ulceration.
Size Location:
-Type I: Multiple lesions 0.5-1 cm in fundus/body
-Type II: 1-2 cm lesions, usually few in number
-Type III: >2 cm, often >5 cm, usually solitary
-Fundus and body most common locations
-Antral involvement rare.
Multifocality:
-Type I: Multifocal in >70% cases (2-50 lesions)
-Type II: Usually few lesions (2-5)
-Type III: Typically solitary (>80% cases)
-ECL cell hyperplasia often present in background mucosa (Type I and II).

Microscopic Description

Histological Features:
-Composed of uniform small cells with round nuclei and granular eosinophilic cytoplasm
-Salt-and-pepper chromatin pattern characteristic
-Organoid, trabecular, or solid growth patterns
-Minimal nuclear pleomorphism
-Low mitotic activity (<2/10 HPF).
Cellular Characteristics:
-Uniform cells with round to oval nuclei
-Fine granular chromatin (salt-and-pepper)
-Inconspicuous nucleoli
-Moderate eosinophilic cytoplasm with fine granules
-Indistinct cell borders
-Minimal pleomorphism and rare mitoses.
Architectural Patterns:
-Organoid pattern (nests and ribbons)
-Trabecular pattern (cords of cells)
-Solid pattern less common
-Pseudorosette formation may be seen
-Rich vascular stroma
-Amyloid deposition occasionally present.
Grading Criteria:
-WHO Grade 1 (G1): <2 mitoses/10 HPF and <3% Ki-67
-WHO Grade 2 (G2): 2-20 mitoses/10 HPF and/or 3-20% Ki-67
-WHO Grade 3 (G3): >20 mitoses/10 HPF and/or >20% Ki-67
-Most gastric carcinoids are Grade 1 or 2.

Immunohistochemistry

Positive Markers:
-Chromogranin A (95-98% positive)
-Synaptophysin (90-95% positive)
-CD56 (NCAM) (85-90% positive)
-Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) (80-85%)
-INSM1 (nuclear, 95% positive)
-Vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2).
Negative Markers:
-TTF-1 (negative, helps exclude lung primary)
-CDX2 (negative to weak positive)
-Cytokeratin 7 (usually negative)
-Cytokeratin 20 (negative to focal positive)
-p63 (negative)
-Smooth muscle actin (negative).
Diagnostic Utility:
-Neuroendocrine markers confirm diagnosis
-INSM1 most sensitive and specific
-Ki-67 proliferation index for grading
-Serotonin positive in minority of gastric carcinoids
-Gastrin occasionally positive
-TTF-1 negativity helps exclude lung metastasis.
Molecular Subtypes:
-No established molecular subtypes
-Histamine production characteristic of gastric ECL cell origin
-Serotonin production less common than in small bowel carcinoids
-Multiple hormones may be co-expressed
-Functional vs non-functional classification based on hormone secretion.

Molecular/Genetic

Genetic Mutations:
-MEN1 gene mutations in Type II associated with MEN-1 syndrome
-CDKN1B mutations (MEN4 syndrome)
-Loss of chromosome 18q in some cases
-TP53 mutations rare in low-grade tumors
-RAS mutations uncommon
-Microsatellite stability in most cases.
Molecular Markers:
-BCL-2 overexpression in some cases
-p53 overexpression rare in low-grade tumors
-VEGF expression correlates with angiogenesis
-SSTR expression (somatostatin receptors) for imaging and therapy
-mTOR pathway activation in some cases.
Prognostic Significance:
-Type I: Excellent prognosis (>95% 10-year survival)
-Type II: Good prognosis if small (<2 cm)
-Type III: Intermediate prognosis (70-80% 5-year survival)
-Size >2 cm increases metastatic risk
-Grade and stage most important prognostic factors.
Therapeutic Targets:
-Somatostatin analogs (octreotide, lanreotide) for functional tumors
-Everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) for progressive disease
-Sunitinib (multi-kinase inhibitor)
-PRRT (peptide receptor radionuclide therapy) for SSTR-positive tumors
-Surgery remains primary treatment.

Differential Diagnosis

Similar Entities:
-Small cell carcinoma (high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma)
-Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma
-Lymphoma (especially marginal zone)
-Metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (lung, pancreas)
-Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor.
Distinguishing Features:
-Carcinoid tumor: Well-differentiated morphology
-Carcinoid tumor: Low Ki-67 <20%
-Carcinoid tumor: Low mitotic rate
-Small cell carcinoma: High-grade morphology
-Small cell carcinoma: High Ki-67 >55%
-Adenocarcinoma: Glandular differentiation
-Adenocarcinoma: Mucin production.
Diagnostic Challenges:
-Distinguishing well-differentiated NET from poorly differentiated NEC
-Identifying primary vs metastatic origin
-Determining grade accurately with Ki-67 and mitoses
-Recognizing mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms.
Rare Variants:
-Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC)
-Goblet cell carcinoid (rare in stomach)
-Tubular carcinoid
-Atypical carcinoid (intermediate grade)
-Oncocytic variant with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm.

Sample Pathology Report

Template Format

Sample Pathology Report

Complete Report: This is an example of how the final pathology report should be structured for this condition.

Specimen Information

[specimen type], measuring [size] cm in greatest dimension

Diagnosis

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (carcinoid tumor)

WHO Classification & Grade

Neuroendocrine tumor, WHO Grade [G1/G2/G3], Type [I/II/III]

Histological Features

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine cells in [growth pattern], mitoses: [count]/10 HPF

Size and Extent

Size: [X] cm, depth: [mucosal/submucosal/muscularis propria]

Immunohistochemistry

Chromogranin A: [+/-], Synaptophysin: [+/-], Ki-67: [%]%, INSM1: [+/-]

Grade Assessment

Mitotic count: [X]/10 HPF, Ki-67 proliferation index: [X]%, WHO Grade: [G1/G2/G3]

Lymphovascular Invasion

Lymphovascular invasion: [present/absent]

Lymph Node Status

Regional lymph nodes: [X] positive out of [X] examined

TNM Staging

TNM: T[X]N[X]M[X], Stage: [I/II/III/IV]

Final Diagnosis

Gastric neuroendocrine tumor (carcinoid), Type [I/II/III], WHO Grade [G1/G2/G3]