Definition/General

Introduction:
-Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a high-grade malignant neuroendocrine neoplasm
-It shows neuroendocrine morphology with high proliferation rate
-Distinguished from neuroendocrine tumors (NET) by grade
-It constitutes 0.1-0.2% of all gastric malignancies
-Also termed poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma.
Origin:
-Arises from gastric neuroendocrine cells
-Originates from enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells
-May develop from gastric NET transformation
-Can arise de novo from gastric mucosa
-Results from neuroendocrine stem cell proliferation.
Classification:
-Classified as Grade 3 (G3) neuroendocrine neoplasm
-WHO classification based on mitotic rate and Ki-67 index
-Distinguished from NET G1 and G2
-Subcategorized into well-differentiated and poorly differentiated
-High-grade malignancy by definition.
Epidemiology:
-Peak incidence in 6th-7th decades
-Male predominance (M:F ratio 2:1)
-More common in Japanese population
-Associated with atrophic gastritis
-Risk factors include chronic gastritis
-Rare in Indian population.

Clinical Features

Presentation:
-Aggressive clinical course
-Epigastric pain and discomfort
-Rapid tumor growth
-Weight loss and anorexia
-Carcinoid syndrome rare due to gastric location
-Palpable mass in advanced cases
-Metastatic disease at presentation common.
Symptoms:
-Abdominal pain (85%)
-Weight loss and anorexia
-Nausea and vomiting
-Gastrointestinal bleeding
-Early satiety
-Carcinoid syndrome (<5% cases)
-Systemic symptoms of malignancy.
Risk Factors:
-Chronic atrophic gastritis
-Helicobacter pylori infection
-Pernicious anemia
-Zollinger-Ellison syndrome
-Previous gastric NET
-Genetic syndromes (MEN1, NF1)
-Smoking and alcohol.
Screening:
-Upper endoscopy with biopsy
-Chromogranin A levels
-24-hour urine 5-HIAA
-Octreotide scintigraphy
-Cross-sectional imaging
-Genetic counseling if syndromic.

Master Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Pathology with RxDx

Access 100+ pathology videos and expert guidance with the RxDx app

Gross Description

Appearance:
-Large, firm tumor with irregular borders
-Gray-tan to yellow cut surface
-Areas of necrosis and hemorrhage
-Infiltrative growth pattern
-May show cystic degeneration.
Characteristics:
-Firm to hard consistency
-Lobulated appearance
-Cut surface shows solid areas
-Hemorrhagic regions common
-May contain calcifications
-Necrotic areas frequently present.
Size Location:
-Size typically 3-15 cm
-Most common in gastric antrum
-May involve body and fundus
-Submucosal origin common
-Can be multifocal
-Transmural invasion frequent.
Multifocality:
-May be multifocal
-High metastatic potential
-Early lymph node involvement
-Liver metastases common
-Bone and lung metastases
-Peritoneal spread possible.

Microscopic Description

Histological Features:
-Solid sheets or trabecular pattern of cells
-High nuclear grade with pleomorphism
-High mitotic activity (>20 per 10 HPF)
-Extensive necrosis common
-Small to medium-sized cells
-Vascular invasion frequent.
Cellular Characteristics:
-Uniform small to medium cells
-High nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio
-Hyperchromatic nuclei
-Prominent nucleoli
-Scant cytoplasm
-Salt-and-pepper chromatin
-Crush artifact common.
Architectural Patterns:
-Solid growth pattern predominant
-Trabecular arrangement
-Ribbon-like patterns
-Organoid structures
-Rosette formation rare
-Invasive growth through gastric wall.
Grading Criteria:
-WHO Grade 3 by definition
-Mitotic count >20 per 10 HPF
-Ki-67 index >20%
-High nuclear grade
-Extensive necrosis
-Poor differentiation.

Immunohistochemistry

Positive Markers:
-Chromogranin A (70-80%)
-Synaptophysin (90-95%)
-CD56/NCAM (85-90%)
-Neuron-specific enolase (NSE)
-Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1)
-High Ki-67 index (>20%).
Negative Markers:
-CK7 (usually negative)
-CK20 (variable)
-CDX2 (usually negative)
-TTF1 (negative)
-Specific hormones (insulin, gastrin) usually negative
-S-100 (negative).
Diagnostic Utility:
-Neuroendocrine markers confirm diagnosis
-High Ki-67 distinguishes from NET
-Chromogranin A may be focal in poorly differentiated tumors
-Synaptophysin more reliable marker
-INSM1 newer, sensitive marker.
Molecular Subtypes:
-Poorly differentiated NEC subtype
-p53 pathway alterations
-RB pathway inactivation
-Different from pancreatic NEC
-Distinct molecular profile from gastric adenocarcinoma.

Molecular/Genetic

Genetic Mutations:
-RB1 mutations/deletions (60-70%)
-TP53 mutations (50-60%)
-ARID1A mutations (30-40%)
-KMT2D mutations (20-25%)
-PIK3CA mutations (15-20%)
-KRAS mutations (10-15%).
Molecular Markers:
-Loss of Rb expression
-p53 overexpression
-High Ki-67 index (>20%)
-Loss of p16
-Cyclin E overexpression
-DAXX/ATRX alterations rare.
Prognostic Significance:
-RB1 loss associated with poor prognosis
-High Ki-67 indicates aggressive behavior
-p53 mutations correlate with metastasis
-ARID1A loss affects chromatin remodeling
-Overall poor prognosis.
Therapeutic Targets:
-Somatostatin analogs (octreotide, lanreotide)
-mTOR inhibitors (everolimus)
-Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sunitinib)
-PARP inhibitors under investigation
-Immunotherapy potential
-Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

Differential Diagnosis

Similar Entities:
-Gastric neuroendocrine tumor (NET G1/G2)
-Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma
-Small cell carcinoma
-Lymphoma
-Metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma.
Distinguishing Features:
-NEC G3: High Ki-67 (>20%)
-NEC: Poor differentiation
-NET G1/G2: Low Ki-67 (<20%)
-NET: Well-differentiated morphology
-Adenocarcinoma: Negative neuroendocrine markers
-Lymphoma: CD45 positive
-Small cell: Smaller cells, TTF1 positive if pulmonary.
Diagnostic Challenges:
-Distinguishing NEC from NET
-Excluding metastatic disease
-Crush artifact interpretation
-Adequate immunohistochemical panel
-Ki-67 assessment crucial
-Clinical correlation required.
Rare Variants:
-Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma
-Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma
-Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN)
-Amphicrine carcinoma
-Composite tumors.

Sample Pathology Report

Template Format

Sample Pathology Report

Complete Report: This is an example of how the final pathology report should be structured for this condition.

Specimen Information

[specimen type], measuring [size] cm in greatest dimension

Diagnosis

Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (WHO Grade 3)

WHO Grading

Grade 3: Ki-67 index [X]%, Mitotic count [X] per 10 HPF

Histological Features

Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma with solid growth pattern

Differentiation

[poorly] differentiated with neuroendocrine morphology

Extent

Invasion depth: [mucosa/submucosa/muscularis propria/serosa]

Margins

Margins are [involved/uninvolved] with closest margin [X] mm

Lymphovascular Invasion

Lymphovascular invasion: [present/absent]

Lymph Node Status

Lymph nodes: [X] positive out of [X] examined

Special Studies

IHC: Chromogranin A: [positive/negative], Synaptophysin: [positive/negative], Ki-67: [X]%

Molecular: RB1: [lost/retained], p53: [overexpressed/normal]

CD56: [positive/negative], INSM1: [positive/negative]

TNM Staging

pT[X] pN[X] pM[X] - Stage [stage]

Final Diagnosis

Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma, WHO Grade 3, Stage [stage]