Definition/General

Introduction:
-Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) represents the second most common renal cell carcinoma subtype
-It constitutes 10-15% of all renal cell carcinomas
-It arises from the distal tubular epithelium
-FNAC shows characteristic papillary architecture and specific cytological features.
Origin:
-Originates from the epithelial cells of the distal convoluted tubules and collecting ducts
-The tumor cells demonstrate papillary architecture with fibrovascular cores
-The neoplastic transformation involves trisomy 7 and 17
-It results in characteristic molecular signature.
Classification:
-Classified according to WHO 2016 classification
-Type 1 pRCC (basophilic, better prognosis)
-Type 2 pRCC (eosinophilic, worse prognosis)
-FNAC helps distinguish subtypes
-WHO/ISUP grading system applies to both types.
Epidemiology:
-Peak incidence in 6th decade
-Male to female ratio is 3-4:1
-Associated with hereditary papillary RCC syndrome
-End-stage renal disease patients at increased risk
-Multifocal tumors more common than in clear cell RCC
-Indian population shows lower incidence compared to Western countries.

Clinical Features

Presentation:
-Incidental finding on imaging (50-60%)
-Abdominal mass (30%)
-Flank pain (25%)
-Hematuria (20%)
-Often asymptomatic until advanced stages
-Bilateral presentation possible
-Multiple lesions in 20% cases.
Symptoms:
-Often asymptomatic in early stages
-Flank pain (dull, intermittent)
-Hematuria (microscopic more common than gross)
-Constitutional symptoms rare unless advanced
-Hypertension (secondary to renal artery involvement)
-Weight loss in advanced cases.
Risk Factors:
-End-stage renal disease (acquired cystic kidney disease)
-Hereditary papillary RCC syndrome (germline MET mutations)
-Long-term dialysis
-Chronic kidney disease
-Trichloroethylene exposure
-Family history of renal cancer
-Male gender.
Screening:
-High-risk patients (ESRD, hereditary syndromes) require regular imaging
-Annual ultrasound or CT for ESRD patients
-Hereditary pRCC families need genetic counseling
-MRI preferred for young patients to avoid radiation.

Master Papillary RCC FNAC Pathology with RxDx

Access 100+ pathology videos and expert guidance with the RxDx app

Gross Description

Appearance:
-Well-circumscribed nodular mass with tan to gray cut surface
-May appear hemorrhagic due to papillary architecture
-Cystic areas common
-Size typically smaller than clear cell RCC (average 3-4 cm)
-Capsule usually present.
Characteristics:
-Tan to brown cut surface with areas of hemorrhage
-Papillary or cystic appearance on cut surface
-Necrosis less common than in clear cell RCC
-Calcifications may be present
-Multifocal tumors show similar appearance.
Size Location:
-Generally smaller than clear cell RCC (1-8 cm, average 3-4 cm)
-Can occur anywhere in kidney
-Multifocal presentation in 20-40% cases
-Bilateral tumors in 5-10% cases
-Cortical location typical.

Microscopic Description

Immunohistochemistry

Positive Markers:
-CK7 (strongly positive, characteristic)
-PAX8 (renal origin)
-AMACR (P504S) (strongly positive)
-Vimentin (variable)
-CD10 (typically negative, unlike clear cell RCC)
-RCC marker (variable)
-EMA (positive).
Negative Markers:
-CD10 (usually negative, key distinguishing feature)
-Carbonic anhydrase IX (negative, unlike clear cell RCC)
-CK20 (negative)
-TTF-1 (negative)
-Chromogranin (negative)
-Synaptophysin (negative).
Diagnostic Utility:
-CK7 positivity distinguishes from clear cell RCC
-AMACR strong positivity supports papillary RCC
-CD10 negativity helps differentiate from clear cell type
-Useful in distinguishing Type 1 vs Type 2 (morphology more important)
-Essential for metastatic workup.

Molecular/Genetic

Genetic Mutations:
-Trisomy 7 and 17 characteristic (both types)
-MET mutations (hereditary Type 1)
-FH mutations (some Type 2 cases)
-CDKN2A deletions (Type 2, aggressive)
-SETD2 mutations (Type 2)
-NF2 mutations (Type 2).
Prognostic Significance:
-Type 1 pRCC generally better prognosis than Type 2
-FH-deficient Type 2 has aggressive behavior
-High nuclear grade indicates worse prognosis
-Sarcomatoid features rare but poor prognostic sign
-Size and stage remain important factors.
Therapeutic Targets:
-MET inhibitors (crizotinib, cabozantinib) for MET-driven tumors
-mTOR inhibitors (temsirolimus) show activity
-VEGF inhibitors less effective than in clear cell RCC
-Immunotherapy limited efficacy
-Targeted therapy based on molecular subtyping.

Differential Diagnosis

Sample Pathology Report

Template Format

Sample Pathology Report

Complete Report: This is an example of how the final pathology report should be structured for this condition.

Specimen Information

FNAC from [kidney mass/renal lesion], [location], performed under [guidance method]

Specimen Adequacy

[Adequate/Inadequate] for cytological interpretation

Cytological Findings

Cellular smears showing [cellularity] with [papillary/tubular] architecture. Cells show [cytoplasmic features] and [nuclear characteristics]. [Type 1/Type 2] features noted

Background

Background shows [foamy macrophages/hemorrhage/hemosiderin]

Cytological Diagnosis

[Diagnostic category] - Consistent with papillary renal cell carcinoma, [Type 1/Type 2/cannot determine type]

Nuclear Grade

Nuclear grade: [WHO/ISUP grade] (if assessable)

Recommendations

[Histopathological correlation/Immunocytochemistry panel/Clinical correlation] recommended

Note

Final subtyping and grading require histopathological examination with immunohistochemistry