Definition/General

Introduction:
-Liposarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in adults
-It represents 20% of all soft tissue sarcomas
-Shows malignant transformation of adipocytic cells
-FNAC reveals atypical lipoblasts and variable cellularity.
Origin:
-Arises from primitive mesenchymal cells with adipocytic differentiation
-Most commonly occurs in deep soft tissues
-Retroperitoneum and thigh are common locations
-Does not arise from pre-existing lipomas.
Classification:
-WHO classification includes: Well-differentiated liposarcoma (atypical lipomatous tumor)
-Myxoid liposarcoma
-Round cell liposarcoma
-Dedifferentiated liposarcoma
-Pleomorphic liposarcoma.
Epidemiology:
-Peak incidence in 5th-7th decades
-Male predominance 1.5:1
-Accounts for 15-20% of adult soft tissue sarcomas
-Retroperitoneal location in 40-45% cases
-Deep-seated tumors more common than superficial.

Clinical Features

Presentation:
-Deep-seated mass (most common)
-Painless swelling initially
-Large size at presentation (>10 cm)
-Firm to hard consistency
-Mass effect symptoms
-Rapid growth (high-grade variants).
Symptoms:
-Initially asymptomatic
-Pain in advanced cases
-Abdominal distension (retroperitoneal)
-Weight loss (large tumors)
-Neurological symptoms (nerve compression)
-Bowel obstruction (intra-abdominal).
Risk Factors:
-Previous radiation exposure
-Li-Fraumeni syndrome (TP53 mutations)
-Neurofibromatosis type 1
-Age >40 years
-Genetic predisposition
-Previous chemotherapy.
Screening:
-Imaging studies for deep masses
-MRI for retroperitoneal tumors
-CT scan for staging
-FNAC/Biopsy for diagnosis
-Multidisciplinary evaluation
-Genetic counseling if indicated.

Master Liposarcoma FNAC Pathology with RxDx

Access 100+ pathology videos and expert guidance with the RxDx app

Gross Description

Appearance:
-Large, lobulated mass
-Variable consistency from soft to firm
-Cut surface shows yellow areas (fat)
-Myxoid areas (gelatinous)
-Necrosis and hemorrhage common
-Poor circumscription.
Characteristics:
-Heterogeneous appearance
-Yellow fatty areas mixed with solid regions
-Myxoid components (gelatinous)
-Areas of necrosis
-Hemorrhage and cystic change
-Infiltrative margins.
Size Location:
-Retroperitoneum (40-45%)
-Deep soft tissues of extremities (35%)
-Intramuscular location common
-Size: Usually >10 cm
-Can reach massive sizes (>30 cm)
-Paratesticular (5%).
Multifocality:
-Usually solitary
-Multifocal disease rare
-Dedifferentiation in well-differentiated type
-Satellite nodules possible
-Local recurrence common
-Metastatic potential varies by subtype.

Microscopic Description

Histological Features:
-FNAC shows atypical lipoblasts with hyperchromatic nuclei
-Uni/multivacuolated cytoplasm
-Nuclear pleomorphism
-Increased cellularity
-Myxoid background (myxoid type)
-Primitive round cells (round cell type).
Cellular Characteristics:
-Lipoblasts with scalloped nuclei
-Hyperchromatic nuclei
-Prominent nucleoli
-Vacuolated cytoplasm
-Nuclear pleomorphism
-Mitotic activity (high-grade).
Architectural Patterns:
-Cellular smears with atypical cells
-Myxoid background (myxoid subtype)
-Monotonous round cells (round cell)
-Pleomorphic pattern (pleomorphic type)
-Mixed cellularity
-Capillary pattern (myxoid).
Grading Criteria:
-FNRS grading system: Differentiation
-Mitotic count
-Necrosis extent
-Grade I: Well-differentiated
-Grade II: Moderately differentiated
-Grade III: Poorly differentiated.

Immunohistochemistry

Positive Markers:
-S-100 protein (variable positivity)
-Vimentin (positive)
-MDM2 (well-differentiated/dedifferentiated)
-CDK4 (well-differentiated/dedifferentiated)
-p16 (myxoid type)
-DDIT3 (myxoid type).
Negative Markers:
-Cytokeratin (usually negative)
-EMA (negative)
-Desmin (negative)
-Smooth muscle actin (negative)
-CD68 (negative)
-MyoD1 (negative).
Diagnostic Utility:
-MDM2/CDK4 positive in well-differentiated/dedifferentiated
-DDIT3 rearrangement in myxoid type
-S-100 variable depending on subtype
-Ki-67 correlates with grade
-p53 overexpression in high-grade.
Molecular Subtypes:
-Well-differentiated: MDM2+, CDK4+
-Myxoid: DDIT3 rearrangement, FUS-DDIT3
-Round cell: DDIT3 rearrangement, high-grade
-Pleomorphic: Complex karyotype
-Dedifferentiated: MDM2+, CDK4+.

Molecular/Genetic

Genetic Mutations:
-MDM2 amplification (12q15) - well-differentiated/dedifferentiated
-FUS-DDIT3 fusion t(12;16) - myxoid
-EWSR1-DDIT3 fusion t(12;22) - myxoid
-Complex karyotype - pleomorphic
-TP53 mutations - high-grade.
Molecular Markers:
-12q13-15 amplification (MDM2, CDK4, HMGA2)
-DDIT3 rearrangement (myxoid/round cell)
-FUS gene rearrangements
-PIK3CA mutations
-RB1 pathway alterations
-Telomerase activation.
Prognostic Significance:
-Subtype determines prognosis
-Well-differentiated: Excellent (local disease)
-Myxoid: Good (low-grade)
-Round cell: Poor (high-grade)
-Dedifferentiated: Poor
-Pleomorphic: Poor prognosis.
Therapeutic Targets:
-MDM2 inhibitors (well-differentiated/dedifferentiated)
-CDK4/6 inhibitors
-Trabectedin (myxoid type)
-PI3K/mTOR inhibitors
-Immunotherapy (selected cases)
-Radiation therapy sensitivity varies.

Differential Diagnosis

Similar Entities:
-Lipoma (benign adipocytic tumor)
-Atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT)
-Other sarcomas with lipoblasts
-Hibernoma (brown fat tumor)
-Spindle cell lipoma
-Pleomorphic adenoma (lipomatous).
Distinguishing Features:
-Liposarcoma: Atypical lipoblasts, nuclear atypia, MDM2+/DDIT3+
-Lipoma: Mature adipocytes, no atypia, MDM2-
-ALT: Atypical cells, MDM2+, low-grade
-Hibernoma: Multivacuolated cells, UCP1+
-Other sarcomas: Different lineage markers
-Pleomorphic adenoma: Epithelial component.
Diagnostic Challenges:
-Distinguishing well-differentiated from lipoma
-Subtyping requires molecular studies
-Sampling issues in heterogeneous tumors
-Dedifferentiation recognition
-Grading accuracy in FNAC
-Myxoid background interpretation.
Rare Variants:
-Inflammatory variant
-Sclerosing variant
-Spindle cell variant
-Mixed-type liposarcoma
-Epithelioid variant
-Osteosarcomatous differentiation (dedifferentiated).

Sample Pathology Report

Template Format

Sample Pathology Report

Complete Report: This is an example of how the final pathology report should be structured for this condition.

Specimen Information

Fine needle aspiration from [site], [size] cm deep soft tissue mass

Clinical History

[age]/[sex] with [duration] history of enlarging deep-seated mass at [site]. Imaging shows [findings].

Gross Examination

Aspirated material: [amount] of hemorrhagic material with fatty and solid components

Microscopic Examination

Smears show increased cellularity with atypical lipoblasts having hyperchromatic, pleomorphic nuclei and vacuolated cytoplasm. [Myxoid background/Round cell population/Pleomorphic cells] noted. Mitotic activity: [count]/10 HPF.

Immunocytochemistry

[MDM2]: [result], [CDK4]: [result], [S-100]: [result], [DDIT3]: [result]

Cytological Diagnosis

Cytological features consistent with LIPOSARCOMA, [subtype], Grade [I/II/III]

Comments

Histopathological examination recommended for subtyping and grading. Molecular studies may be helpful. Multidisciplinary management advised.