Overview

Definition:
-Portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) is a condition characterized by mucosal and submucosal changes in the stomach lining, occurring secondary to increased portal venous pressure, typically in the setting of cirrhosis
-These changes are thought to result from increased mucosal blood flow, venous congestion, and intramural edema, leading to a fragile and easily bleeding mucosa.
Epidemiology:
-PHG is a common complication of portal hypertension, with its prevalence varying widely in studies, ranging from 5% to over 90% in patients with cirrhosis, depending on the diagnostic criteria and patient population
-It is a significant cause of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver disease.
Clinical Significance:
-PHG contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in patients with portal hypertension by causing chronic or acute gastrointestinal bleeding
-This bleeding can range from occult blood loss leading to iron deficiency anemia to severe, life-threatening hematemesis and melena
-Understanding PHG is crucial for appropriate diagnosis and management, particularly when differentiating it from gastric varices, which have different treatment strategies.

Clinical Presentation

Symptoms:
-Intermittent or chronic occult blood loss leading to iron deficiency anemia
-Intermittent or recurrent upper GI bleeding presenting as hematemesis (vomiting blood) or melena (black, tarry stools)
-Dyspeptic symptoms such as abdominal discomfort, nausea, or early satiety may be present but are non-specific
-Bleeding may be mild or severe, sometimes life-threatening.
Signs:
-Pallor and signs of anemia (e.g., fatigue, dyspnea on exertion)
-Epigastric tenderness may be present in some patients
-Signs of underlying liver disease such as jaundice, ascites, splenomegaly, and caput medusae are common
-Vital signs may be normal or show signs of hypovolemia (tachycardia, hypotension) in cases of significant bleeding.
Diagnostic Criteria:
-There are no universally agreed-upon diagnostic criteria for PHG
-diagnosis is largely endoscopic
-The Japanese Research Society for Portal Hypertension has proposed a classification based on endoscopic findings, grading PHG from mild (Grade 1: diffuse erythema, mosaic pattern) to severe (Grade 2: elevated edematous areas, vascular ectasia)
-Biopsies are often non-specific but can help rule out other pathologies.

Diagnostic Approach

History Taking:
-Detailed history of liver disease (etiology, duration, complications like ascites, encephalopathy)
-History of upper GI bleeding or dyspepsia
-Medications (NSAIDs, anticoagulants)
-Alcohol intake
-Previous endoscopic findings
-Family history of GI disorders.
Physical Examination:
-General examination to assess for pallor, jaundice, and signs of chronic liver disease (ascites, edema, splenomegaly, spider angiomata, palmar erythema)
-Abdominal examination for tenderness, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and ascites
-Rectal examination to check for melena or fresh blood.
Investigations:
-Complete blood count (CBC) to assess for anemia and thrombocytopenia
-Liver function tests (LFTs) including bilirubin, albumin, prothrombin time (PT), and INR
-Viral serology for Hepatitis B and C
-Ultrasound abdomen with Doppler to assess portal vein patency, diameter, and flow
-Endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy - EGD) is the gold standard to visualize mucosal changes, assess for varices, and rule out other causes of bleeding
-Biopsies can be taken but are often non-diagnostic for PHG itself.
Differential Diagnosis:
-Gastric varices (must be differentiated, as management differs)
-Peptic ulcer disease
-Mallory-Weiss tears
-Gastritis
-Esophagitis
-Gastric malignancy
-Dieulafoy's lesion
-Angiodysplasia.

Management

Initial Management:
-Hemodynamic stabilization with intravenous fluids and blood transfusions if necessary
-Correction of coagulopathy if present
-Nasogastric lavage to assess for ongoing bleeding and clear gastric contents
-Pharmacological management to reduce portal pressure.
Medical Management:
-Beta-blockers (e.g., propranolol, nadolol) are the mainstay for reducing portal pressure and preventing variceal bleeding, and they can also help reduce PHG bleeding
-Somatostatin analogues or octreotide may be used for acute bleeding episodes
-Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are typically used to reduce gastric acid and aid mucosal healing, though their direct effect on PHG bleeding is debated.
Surgical Management:
-The role of surgery in PHG is generally limited and reserved for refractory bleeding that does not respond to medical management or endoscopic therapy
-Surgical options are usually directed at reducing portal pressure, such as portosystemic shunts (e.g., TIPS - transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, surgical shunts like mesocaval, splenorenal)
-Direct surgical resection of PHG lesions is rarely performed due to diffuse nature and poor healing
-In severe, life-threatening bleeding unresponsive to other measures, distal splenorenal shunt or even portacaval shunt might be considered, but with significant risks
-Gastric devascularization procedures are generally not effective for PHG.
Supportive Care:
-Nutritional support is essential for patients with liver disease
-Regular monitoring for signs of bleeding and liver decompensation
-Management of ascites and hepatic encephalopathy.

Complications

Early Complications:
-Severe acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage leading to hypovolemic shock
-Rebleeding following initial treatment
-Anemia secondary to chronic blood loss.
Late Complications:
-Chronic iron deficiency anemia impairing quality of life
-Progressive liver dysfunction
-Complications related to treatment of portal hypertension (e.g., hepatic encephalopathy, shunt dysfunction).
Prevention Strategies:
-Optimal medical management of underlying liver disease
-Early diagnosis and management of portal hypertension
-Prophylactic beta-blocker therapy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, particularly those with increased risk of bleeding.

Prognosis

Factors Affecting Prognosis:
-Severity of underlying liver disease (Child-Pugh score, MELD score)
-Degree of portal hypertension
-Presence and severity of bleeding
-Response to medical and endoscopic therapy
-Development of complications from treatment interventions.
Outcomes:
-Prognosis is largely determined by the underlying liver disease
-PHG itself is a chronic condition that requires ongoing management
-Bleeding episodes can be managed with medical therapy and sometimes TIPS
-The goal is to control bleeding and prevent recurrent episodes while managing the liver disease.
Follow Up:
-Regular follow-up with a gastroenterologist or hepatologist is crucial to monitor liver disease status, portal hypertension, and for recurrent bleeding
-Endoscopic surveillance may be required
-Long-term medical therapy, especially beta-blockers, is typically needed.

Key Points

Exam Focus:
-PHG is a common cause of GI bleeding in cirrhosis, secondary to portal hypertension, distinct from variceal bleeding
-Endoscopy is key for diagnosis
-Medical management focuses on reducing portal pressure (beta-blockers) and acid suppression
-Surgical role is limited to refractory bleeding, typically by reducing portal pressure (e.g., TIPS).
Clinical Pearls:
-Always consider PHG in a patient with cirrhosis presenting with GI bleeding, especially if varices are absent or small
-Differentiating PHG from gastric varices on endoscopy is critical for management
-Refractory PHG bleeding may necessitate TIPS, not surgical resection of gastric mucosa.
Common Mistakes:
-Mistaking PHG for gastric varices and treating it with sclerotherapy or band ligation, which are ineffective for PHG
-Overlooking the contribution of PHG to bleeding in patients with known varices
-Delaying TIPS in appropriately selected patients with refractory PHG bleeding.