Definition/General

Introduction:
-Cervical mesonephric remnants are benign developmental structures representing persistent remnants of the embryonic mesonephric (Wolffian) duct system
-These structures normally regress in females during embryonic development.
Origin:
-Derived from embryonic mesonephric (Wolffian) ducts that normally regress in female embryos
-Persistence of these structures results in small tubular remnants within cervical stroma.
Classification:
-WHO Classification categorizes as benign developmental remnant
-Part of mesonephric duct derivatives
-May be tubular, cystic, or solid depending on degree of involution.
Epidemiology:
-Present in most women as microscopic remnants
-Clinically apparent lesions rare
-No age predilection
-Incidental finding in majority of cases.

Clinical Features

Presentation:
-Usually asymptomatic and incidental microscopic finding
-Rarely may present as palpable cervical mass or cyst
-Often discovered during routine histological examination.
Symptoms:
-Typically asymptomatic
-Large cysts may cause cervical enlargement
-Rarely associated with dyspareunia
-May cause cervical irregularity on examination.
Risk Factors:
-No specific risk factors
-Represents normal developmental variation
-Not associated with hormonal factors or environmental influences.
Screening:
-Incidental finding on routine examination
-Not detected by routine screening methods
-May be identified on ultrasound as small cervical cysts.

Master Cervical Mesonephric Remnants Pathology with RxDx

Access 100+ pathology videos and expert guidance with the RxDx app

Gross Description

Appearance:
-Small, tubular or cystic structures within cervical stroma
-Usually microscopic
-When visible, appear as small white or translucent nodules.
Characteristics:
-Size typically microscopic (<1 mm)
-White to translucent appearance
-Firm consistency
-May contain clear fluid if cystic.
Size Location:
-Located deep within cervical stroma, usually lateral aspects
-Size ranges from microscopic to few millimeters
-Multiple small structures common.
Multifocality:
-Often multiple small remnants
-Bilateral distribution common
-May be scattered throughout cervical stroma.

Microscopic Description

Histological Features:
-Small tubular structures lined by single layer of cuboidal to low columnar epithelium
-No surrounding specialized stroma
-Clear to eosinophilic luminal contents.
Cellular Characteristics:
-Epithelial lining: cuboidal to low columnar cells
-Uniform nuclei without atypia
-Scant cytoplasm
-No mitotic activity
-Basement membrane intact.
Architectural Patterns:
-Small, round to oval tubular structures
-May be solid, tubular, or cystic
-No complex branching patterns
-Surrounded by normal cervical stroma.
Grading Criteria:
-Benign developmental structure (no grading applicable)
-Distinguished by bland morphology and characteristic location.

Immunohistochemistry

Positive Markers:
-PAX8 positive (characteristic marker)
-CK7 positive
-Calretinin positive
-CD10 negative (unlike endometrial stroma).
Negative Markers:
-Estrogen receptor (ER) negative
-Progesterone receptor (PR) negative
-CEA negative
-TTF-1 negative.
Diagnostic Utility:
-PAX8 is most useful diagnostic marker for mesonephric remnants
-Negative hormone receptors distinguish from endocervical glands.
Molecular Subtypes:
-No molecular subtypes
-Represent embryological developmental remnants without neoplastic potential.

Molecular/Genetic

Genetic Mutations:
-No genetic mutations associated
-Represent normal embryological structures with arrested development rather than neoplastic process.
Molecular Markers:
-PAX8 expression characteristic
-No hormonal responsiveness
-Normal cellular genetics
-No proliferative activity.
Prognostic Significance:
-Completely benign with no clinical significance
-No malignant potential
-No association with increased cancer risk.
Therapeutic Targets:
-No treatment required
-Observation only
-Surgical intervention not indicated unless large and symptomatic.

Differential Diagnosis

Similar Entities:
-Endocervical glands
-Endometriosis
-Adenomyosis
-Mesonephric adenocarcinoma
-Tunnel clusters
-Nabothian cysts.
Distinguishing Features:
-Mesonephric remnants: PAX8+, hormone receptors-
-Endocervical: CEA+, hormone receptors+
-Endometriosis: CD10+ stroma.
Diagnostic Challenges:
-Small size makes identification difficult
-Distinction from other glandular structures
-Recognition of characteristic immunoprofile.
Rare Variants:
-Mesonephric hyperplasia
-Florid mesonephric remnants
-Cystic mesonephric remnants.

Sample Pathology Report

Template Format

Sample Pathology Report

Complete Report: This is an example of how the final pathology report should be structured for this condition.

Specimen Information

[specimen type], measuring [size] cm in greatest dimension

Diagnosis

[diagnosis name]

Classification

Classification: [classification system] [grade/type]

Histological Features

Shows [architectural pattern] with [nuclear features] and [mitotic activity]

Size and Extent

Size: [X] cm, extent: [local/regional/metastatic]

Margins

Margins are [involved/uninvolved] with closest margin [X] mm

Lymphovascular Invasion

Lymphovascular invasion: [present/absent]

Lymph Node Status

Lymph nodes: [X] positive out of [X] examined

Special Studies

IHC: [marker]: [result]

Molecular: [test]: [result]

[other study]: [result]

Prognostic Factors

Prognostic factors: [list factors]

Final Diagnosis

Final diagnosis: [complete diagnosis]