Definition/General

Introduction:
-Cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most common malignant tumor of the cervix
-It accounts for 75-80% of all cervical cancers
-It arises from the transformation zone of the cervix
-It is strongly associated with high-risk HPV infection.
Origin:
-Originates from the squamous epithelium of the cervix
-Specifically from the transformation zone where squamous and glandular epithelium meet
-The neoplastic process involves HPV-induced transformation
-It progresses through cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)
-It eventually leads to invasive carcinoma.
Classification:
-Classified by FIGO staging system
-Stage I: confined to cervix
-Stage II: beyond cervix but not to pelvic wall
-Stage III: extends to pelvic wall or lower third of vagina
-Stage IV: beyond pelvis or involves bladder/rectum
-Histological grading: well-differentiated, moderately differentiated, poorly differentiated.
Epidemiology:
-Peak incidence in 4th-5th decades
-Strong association with high-risk HPV (types 16, 18)
-Risk factors include multiple sexual partners
-Early sexual activity
-Smoking
-Immunosuppression
-Indian population shows high incidence in rural areas
-Leading cause of cancer death in developing countries.

Clinical Features

Presentation:
-Postcoital bleeding (most common)
-Intermenstrual bleeding
-Postmenopausal bleeding
-Vaginal discharge (foul-smelling, blood-stained)
-Pelvic pain
-Urinary symptoms
-Bowel symptoms (advanced disease).
Symptoms:
-Abnormal vaginal bleeding (90% cases)
-Vaginal discharge (80%)
-Pelvic pain (60%)
-Dyspareunia
-Urinary frequency
-Hematuria (advanced)
-Constipation (advanced)
-Weight loss
-Fatigue.
Risk Factors:
-High-risk HPV infection (16, 18, 31, 33, 45)
-Multiple sexual partners
-Early age at first intercourse (<18 years)
-Smoking
-Immunosuppression (HIV, transplant)
-Long-term oral contraceptive use
-High parity
-Low socioeconomic status.
Screening:
-Pap smear (cervical cytology)
-HPV testing (co-testing or primary)
-Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA)
-Colposcopy for abnormal screening
-Liquid-based cytology
-HPV vaccination (prevention).

Master Cervical SCC Pathology with RxDx

Access 100+ pathology videos and expert guidance with the RxDx app

Gross Description

Appearance:
-Exophytic mass protruding from cervix
-Ulcerative lesion with irregular margins
-Endophytic growth causing barrel-shaped cervix
-Surface may be friable and hemorrhagic
-Cut surface shows gray-white solid areas.
Characteristics:
-Firm consistency with areas of necrosis
-Hemorrhage and ulceration common
-Size varies from small lesions to large masses
-Surface may show papillary configuration
-Cut surface reveals solid gray-white tissue.
Size Location:
-Size ranges from microscopic to >10 cm
-Commonly arises from transformation zone
-May involve anterior or posterior lip
-Can extend to vaginal fornices
-Advanced cases involve parametrium.
Multifocality:
-Usually unifocal at presentation
-May show skip lesions in advanced cases
-CIN often present in adjacent epithelium
-Lymphovascular invasion correlates with stage
-Parametrial extension indicates advanced disease.

Microscopic Description

Histological Features:
-Malignant squamous cells with intercellular bridges
-Keratin formation (well-differentiated)
-Nuclear pleomorphism and hyperchromatism
-Increased mitotic activity
-Basement membrane disruption
-Desmoplastic stromal reaction.
Cellular Characteristics:
-Pleomorphic squamous cells with irregular nuclei
-Prominent nucleoli in poorly differentiated tumors
-Eosinophilic cytoplasm with keratinization
-Intercellular bridges visible
-Individual cell keratinization (dyskeratosis).
Architectural Patterns:
-Nests and sheets of malignant cells
-Keratinizing type: keratin pearl formation
-Non-keratinizing type: minimal keratinization
-Basaloid type: small cells with basaloid features
-Verrucous type: exophytic growth with minimal cytological atypia.
Grading Criteria:
-Well-differentiated: keratin pearls, minimal pleomorphism
-Moderately differentiated: some keratinization, moderate pleomorphism
-Poorly differentiated: minimal keratinization, marked pleomorphism
-Grading based on keratinization, nuclear pleomorphism, and mitotic activity.

Immunohistochemistry

Positive Markers:
-p16 (diffuse positive in HPV-related)
-CK5/6 and CK14
-p63 (nuclear staining)
-p40 (specific for squamous differentiation)
-CK7 (variable)
-EMA
-Ki-67 (high proliferation index).
Negative Markers:
-CEA (helps distinguish from adenocarcinoma)
-CK20
-TTF-1
-ER and PR (usually negative)
-Vimentin (usually negative)
-Melanoma markers (S-100, melanA).
Diagnostic Utility:
-p16 positivity indicates HPV infection
-Essential for distinguishing from adenocarcinoma
-p63/p40 positivity confirms squamous differentiation
-Ki-67 assesses proliferation
-Helps in grading and prognosis.
Molecular Subtypes:
-HPV-positive (most cases, better prognosis)
-HPV-negative (rare, poorer prognosis)
-Keratinizing type (often HPV 16-related)
-Non-keratinizing type (often HPV 18-related).

Molecular/Genetic

Genetic Mutations:
-HPV integration (E6 and E7 oncoproteins)
-p53 inactivation (via E6 protein)
-pRb inactivation (via E7 protein)
-PIK3CA mutations (20-30%)
-KRAS mutations (10-15%)
-TP53 mutations (in HPV-negative cases).
Molecular Markers:
-p16 overexpression (surrogate for HPV)
-Ki-67 high expression
-p53 overexpression (variable)
-Cyclin E overexpression
-HPV DNA integration
-Loss of heterozygosity at multiple loci.
Prognostic Significance:
-HPV status determines prognosis
-HPV-positive tumors have better prognosis
-p16 positivity associated with better response to therapy
-Ki-67 index correlates with grade
-FIGO stage most important prognostic factor.
Therapeutic Targets:
-HPV vaccination (prevention)
-Immunotherapy (pembrolizumab for advanced cases)
-Bevacizumab (anti-VEGF therapy)
-Cisplatin-based chemotherapy
-Radiation therapy
-Targeted therapy under investigation.

Differential Diagnosis

Similar Entities:
-Adenocarcinoma (glandular differentiation, different IHC)
-Adenosquamous carcinoma (mixed features)
-Small cell carcinoma (neuroendocrine features)
-Sarcoma (mesenchymal differentiation)
-Metastatic carcinoma.
Distinguishing Features:
-SCC: p63/p40 positive
-SCC: intercellular bridges
-SCC: keratinization
-Adenocarcinoma: CEA positive
-Adenocarcinoma: glandular architecture
-Small cell: neuroendocrine markers
-Sarcoma: vimentin positive.
Diagnostic Challenges:
-Distinguishing poorly differentiated SCC from adenocarcinoma
-Small cell carcinoma vs poorly differentiated SCC
-Adenosquamous carcinoma diagnosis
-Metastatic vs primary carcinoma
-Immunohistochemistry essential for accurate diagnosis.
Rare Variants:
-Verrucous carcinoma (HPV 6/11-related, indolent)
-Warty carcinoma (condylomatous features)
-Papillary carcinoma (exophytic growth)
-Basaloid carcinoma (aggressive variant)
-Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma.

Sample Pathology Report

Template Format

Sample Pathology Report

Complete Report: This is an example of how the final pathology report should be structured for this condition.

Specimen Information

[specimen type], measuring [size] cm in greatest dimension

Diagnosis

Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of cervix

Classification

FIGO Stage: [stage], Histological grade: [grade]

Histological Features

Shows [keratinization pattern] with [nuclear features] and [architectural pattern]

Size and Extent

Tumor size: [X] cm, depth of invasion: [X] mm

Margins

Margins are [involved/uninvolved] with closest margin [X] mm

Lymphovascular Invasion

Lymphovascular invasion: [present/absent]

Lymph Node Status

Lymph nodes: [X] positive out of [X] examined

Special Studies

p16: [positive/negative], p63: [positive/negative]

HPV status: [positive/negative/not tested]

[other study]: [result]

Prognostic Factors

FIGO stage, tumor size, grade, lymph node status, HPV status

Final Diagnosis

Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of cervix, FIGO Stage [stage], Grade [grade]