Definition/General

Introduction:
-Complex endometrial hyperplasia is a proliferative disorder characterized by increased architectural complexity of endometrial glands
-It includes hyperplasia without atypia and atypical hyperplasia/EIN in WHO classification
-It shows crowded, irregularly shaped glands
-Atypical hyperplasia has significant malignant potential (25-30%).
Origin:
-Results from prolonged unopposed estrogen stimulation
-Represents progressive architectural distortion
-May progress from simple hyperplasia
-Atypical hyperplasia shows additional nuclear changes
-Associated with clonal proliferation
-Precursor lesion to endometrioid carcinoma.
Classification:
-WHO 2014 classification includes hyperplasia without atypia and atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN)
-Complex hyperplasia without atypia: Architectural complexity, no nuclear atypia
-Atypical hyperplasia/EIN: Nuclear atypia present, high cancer risk
-Replaces old complex atypical hyperplasia terminology.
Epidemiology:
-Peak incidence in 4th-5th decades
-Perimenopausal women most affected
-Risk factors similar to endometrial carcinoma
-PCOS commonly associated
-Obesity strongly associated
-Complex with atypia has 25-30% cancer risk
-Without atypia has 2-5% cancer risk.

Clinical Features

Presentation:
-Abnormal uterine bleeding (most common)
-Heavy menstrual bleeding
-Irregular menstrual cycles
-Intermenstrual bleeding
-Postmenopausal bleeding
-Prolonged menstruation
-Pelvic pressure (enlarged uterus)
-Infertility (anovulatory cycles).
Symptoms:
-Abnormal uterine bleeding (90%)
-Menorrhagia
-Metrorrhagia
-Iron deficiency anemia
-Fatigue and weakness
-Pelvic pain (may be present)
-Dysmenorrhea
-Mood changes
-Weight gain (hormonal).
Risk Factors:
-Unopposed estrogen (endogenous/exogenous)
-Obesity (BMI >30)
-PCOS
-Diabetes mellitus
-Nulliparity
-Late menopause
-Lynch syndrome (hereditary)
-Tamoxifen therapy
-Estrogen-producing tumors
-Chronic anovulation.
Screening:
-No routine screening
-Endometrial sampling for abnormal bleeding
-Transvaginal ultrasound (endometrial thickness)
-Hysteroscopy with targeted biopsy
-MRI for complex cases
-CA-125 may be elevated
-Genetic counseling (Lynch syndrome).

Master Complex Hyperplasia Pathology with RxDx

Access 100+ pathology videos and expert guidance with the RxDx app

Gross Description

Appearance:
-Markedly thickened endometrium
-Irregular, polypoid surface
-Soft, spongy consistency
-Pale to hemorrhagic areas
-Cut surface shows cystic spaces
-Nodular or lobulated appearance
-May have focal firm areas.
Characteristics:
-Increased endometrial thickness (>5mm postmenopausal)
-Heterogeneous appearance
-Polypoid projections common
-Cystic dilatation of glands
-Areas of hemorrhage
-Variable consistency
-Well-vascularized.
Size Location:
-Diffuse involvement of endometrial cavity
-May show focal accentuation
-Fundal predominance common
-Cornual extension possible
-No myometrial invasion (by definition)
-May be polypoid.
Multifocality:
-Multifocal distribution common
-Skip lesions possible
-Coexisting simple hyperplasia
-Background proliferative endometrium
-Associated polyps possible
-Heterogeneous involvement.

Microscopic Description

Histological Features:
-Crowded, irregularly shaped glands
-Back-to-back arrangement
-Increased gland-to-stroma ratio
-Loss of intervening stroma
-Complex architectural patterns
-Branching and budding of glands
-Papillary infoldings.
Cellular Characteristics:
-Without atypia: Uniform nuclei, maintained polarity
-With atypia/EIN: Nuclear enlargement, hyperchromasia, loss of polarity
-Increased mitotic activity
-Nucleolar prominence (atypical)
-Cytoplasmic eosinophilia
-Loss of ciliated cells.
Architectural Patterns:
-Complex branching of glands
-Papillary projections
-Cribriform patterns
-Back-to-back glands
-Glandular budding
-Decreased stroma (<55% in EIN)
-Irregular glandular contours.
Grading Criteria:
-Without atypia: Complex architecture, no nuclear atypia
-With atypia (EIN): Nuclear atypia present, glands occupy >55% of tissue
-EIN criteria: Size >1mm, clonal proliferation, exclude mimics
-D-score system may be used.

Immunohistochemistry

Positive Markers:
-Estrogen receptor (ER) - positive but may be reduced
-Progesterone receptor (PR) - variable, often reduced
-Ki-67 - increased proliferation
-PAX8 - positive
-PTEN - lost in 60-80% of EIN cases
-β-catenin - nuclear staining in some cases.
Negative Markers:
-p53 - wild-type pattern (patchy staining)
-p16 - negative or patchy
-Mismatch repair proteins - may be lost in Lynch syndrome
-Vimentin - stromal cells positive
-CD10 - stromal cells positive.
Diagnostic Utility:
-PTEN loss supports diagnosis of EIN
-Mismatch repair proteins screening for Lynch syndrome
-Ki-67 shows increased proliferation in atypical areas
-β-catenin nuclear staining may indicate progression risk
-p53 staining excludes serous pathology.
Molecular Subtypes:
-PTEN-null subtype (most EIN cases)
-Microsatellite instable (Lynch syndrome)
-POLE-mutated (rare)
-β-catenin activated subtype
-Hormonal pathway driven
-Precursor molecular profile.

Molecular/Genetic

Genetic Mutations:
-PTEN mutations (60-80% of EIN)
-PIK3CA mutations (20-30%)
-KRAS mutations (10-15%)
-Mismatch repair gene mutations (Lynch syndrome)
-ARID1A mutations
-CTNNB1 mutations (β-catenin)
-POLE mutations (rare).
Molecular Markers:
-PTEN loss (immunohistochemistry)
-PIK3CA overexpression
-Microsatellite instability (Lynch cases)
-β-catenin nuclear accumulation
-Increased Ki-67
-Altered hormone receptor expression.
Prognostic Significance:
-PTEN loss indicates higher cancer risk
-Microsatellite instability may predict better prognosis if cancer develops
-Multiple mutations indicate higher progression risk
-Molecular profile similar to grade 1 endometrioid carcinoma
-Clonal expansion precedes invasion.
Therapeutic Targets:
-Progestins (first-line therapy)
-Levonorgestrel IUD (local therapy)
-Metformin (insulin sensitizer)
-Aromatase inhibitors (postmenopausal)
-GnRH agonists
-Bariatric surgery (morbid obesity)
-PI3K inhibitors (investigational).

Differential Diagnosis

Similar Entities:
-Simple hyperplasia
-Well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma
-Endometrial polyp
-Secretory endometrium
-Arias-Stella reaction
-Disordered proliferative endometrium
-Breakdown endometrium.
Distinguishing Features:
-Complex hyperplasia: Crowded glands
-Complex hyperplasia: Back-to-back arrangement
-Complex hyperplasia: No stromal invasion
-Simple hyperplasia: Regular glandular spacing
-Carcinoma: Stromal invasion present
-Carcinoma: Confluent growth
-EIN: PTEN loss
-EIN: Nuclear atypia
-Polyp: Thick-walled vessels.
Diagnostic Challenges:
-Distinguishing EIN from early carcinoma
-Recognizing focal atypical areas
-Separating from artifact (tangential sections)
-Identifying stromal invasion
-Sampling adequacy assessment
-Hormonal effects recognition.
Rare Variants:
-Microglandular hyperplasia
-Clear cell change in hyperplasia
-Squamous metaplasia with hyperplasia
-Ciliated cell change
-Surface syncytial change
-Secretory hyperplasia.

Sample Pathology Report

Template Format

Sample Pathology Report

Complete Report: This is an example of how the final pathology report should be structured for this condition.

Specimen Information

Endometrial biopsy/curettage specimen consisting of [amount] of tissue

Specimen Adequacy

Adequate for histopathological evaluation

Diagnosis

Endometrial hyperplasia [without atypia/with atypia (EIN)]

Classification

WHO Classification: [Hyperplasia without atypia/Atypical hyperplasia (EIN)]

Histological Features

Complex architectural pattern with crowded, irregularly shaped glands

Nuclear Features

[No nuclear atypia/Nuclear atypia present] - [details]

Architectural Pattern

Complex glandular architecture with [back-to-back arrangement/branching/papillary infoldings]

Stromal Assessment

Gland-to-stroma ratio: [increased], stromal volume: [<55%/>55%]

Special Studies

PTEN: [retained/lost], Mismatch repair proteins: [intact/lost]

Molecular studies: [if performed]

Malignant Potential

[Without atypia: 2-5% cancer risk/With atypia: 25-30% cancer risk]

Recommendations

[Conservative management with progestins/Consider hysterectomy for atypical hyperplasia]

Follow-up

[3-6 month follow-up for without atypia/Close follow-up or definitive surgery for EIN]

Prognostic Factors

Presence of atypia, patient age, response to therapy

Final Diagnosis

Endometrial [complex hyperplasia without atypia/atypical hyperplasia (EIN)]