Definition/General

Introduction:
-Endometrial mesonephric carcinoma is an extremely rare malignant tumor that morphologically resembles mesonephric carcinoma of the cervix
-It represents less than 1% of all endometrial carcinomas
-It is also termed mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma
-It has distinct morphological and molecular features.
Origin:
-The exact origin is controversial
-May arise from mesonephric remnants in the endometrium
-More likely represents müllerian epithelium with mesonephric-like differentiation
-Shows morphological mimicry of true mesonephric carcinoma
-Molecular studies suggest müllerian origin.
Classification:
-WHO classification includes under other epithelial tumors
-Also termed mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma
-Distinguished from true cervical mesonephric carcinoma
-Characterized by specific molecular alterations
-All cases considered high-grade tumors.
Epidemiology:
-Extremely rare with fewer than 100 cases reported in literature
-Peak incidence in 5th-6th decades
-Mean age 55-65 years
-Younger than typical endometrial carcinoma
-No specific risk factors identified
-Aggressive behavior with poor prognosis.

Clinical Features

Presentation:
-Abnormal uterine bleeding (most common)
-Postmenopausal bleeding
-Pelvic mass or enlarged uterus
-Advanced stage at presentation common
-Pelvic pain
-Rapid symptom progression
-Constitutional symptoms (weight loss, fatigue).
Symptoms:
-Abnormal uterine bleeding (80-90%)
-Pelvic pressure and pain
-Bulky uterine mass
-Vaginal discharge
-Abdominal distension
-Urinary symptoms (advanced cases)
-Bowel symptoms (rare)
-Metastatic symptoms at presentation possible.
Risk Factors:
-No specific risk factors identified
-Age (perimenopausal/postmenopausal)
-No association with typical endometrial carcinoma risk factors
-No hormonal associations
-May have genetic predisposition
-Rare tumor with unknown etiology.
Screening:
-No specific screening guidelines
-Endometrial sampling for abnormal bleeding
-Imaging studies (ultrasound, MRI)
-Advanced imaging for staging
-Tumor markers not specific
-Molecular testing important for diagnosis.

Master Mesonephric Carcinoma Pathology with RxDx

Access 100+ pathology videos and expert guidance with the RxDx app

Gross Description

Appearance:
-Solid, firm, gray-white mass with well-defined margins
-Cut surface shows homogeneous appearance
-May have cystic areas
-Size variable but often large at presentation
-Hemorrhage and necrosis less common than other high-grade tumors.
Characteristics:
-Firm consistency with gray-white coloration
-Well-circumscribed appearance
-May show microcystic areas
-Solid growth pattern predominates
-Areas of calcification possible
-Less necrotic than typical high-grade carcinomas.
Size Location:
-Usually involves entire endometrial cavity
-Size ranges from 4-12 cm
-Deep myometrial invasion common
-May extend to cervix
-Extrauterine extension frequent at presentation
-Lymphovascular invasion often present.
Multifocality:
-Usually unifocal
-Multicentric growth possible
-Lymph node metastases common
-Peritoneal implants may be present
-Distant metastases at presentation possible
-Aggressive spread pattern.

Microscopic Description

Histological Features:
-Small, closely packed tubules and glands with minimal intervening stroma
-Round to oval glands with eosinophilic secretions
-Cuboidal to low columnar epithelial cells
-Uniform nuclear features
-Mitotic activity variable but present
-Desmoplastic stroma uncommon.
Cellular Characteristics:
-Cuboidal to low columnar cells
-Uniform, round nuclei with fine chromatin
-Eosinophilic cytoplasm
-Inconspicuous nucleoli
-Minimal nuclear pleomorphism
-Mitotic figures present but variable
-Apoptotic bodies may be seen.
Architectural Patterns:
-Tubular pattern predominates
-Closely packed small glands
-Solid areas may be present
-Papillary areas uncommon
-Retiform pattern possible
-Cribriform areas rare
-Minimal stromal component.
Grading Criteria:
-All mesonephric carcinomas considered high-grade by definition
-Architectural complexity varies
-Nuclear grade typically low to intermediate
-Mitotic activity variable
-Biological behavior aggressive despite morphology.

Immunohistochemistry

Positive Markers:
-GATA3 (diffusely positive, highly specific)
-TTF-1 (positive in most cases)
-CD10 (may be positive)
-Calretinin (variable)
-Inhibin (variable)
-PAX8 (usually negative, helps distinguish from müllerian tumors)
-Cytokeratins (CK7, CAM5.2).
Negative Markers:
-Hormone receptors (ER, PR) - typically negative
-PAX8 - usually negative (key distinguishing feature)
-WT1 - negative
-Napsin A - negative
-HNF-1β - negative
-p16 - usually negative or patchy.
Diagnostic Utility:
-GATA3 positivity is highly characteristic and diagnostic
-PAX8 negativity distinguishes from müllerian tumors
-TTF-1 positivity supports diagnosis
-Hormone receptor negativity typical
-Combination panel essential for accurate diagnosis.
Molecular Subtypes:
-Specific molecular signature
-KRAS mutations common
-PIK3CA mutations frequent
-ARID1A mutations
-p53 wild-type pattern usually
-Microsatellite stable
-Distinct molecular profile from typical endometrial carcinomas.

Molecular/Genetic

Genetic Mutations:
-KRAS mutations (70-80%)
-PIK3CA mutations (40-50%)
-ARID1A mutations (30-40%)
-SMARCA4 mutations
-PTEN mutations (less common)
-p53 mutations rare
-Mismatch repair genes usually intact.
Molecular Markers:
-KRAS overexpression
-PI3K/AKT pathway activation
-ARID1A loss
-Microsatellite stability
-p53 wild-type expression
-Low Ki-67 despite aggressive behavior
-Chromosomal stability pattern.
Prognostic Significance:
-Aggressive behavior despite molecular features
-KRAS mutations may predict resistance to certain therapies
-PIK3CA mutations may indicate sensitivity to PI3K inhibitors
-Stage most important prognostic factor
-Early stage has better prognosis.
Therapeutic Targets:
-PI3K/AKT inhibitors for PIK3CA mutations
-KRAS pathway inhibitors under investigation
-MEK inhibitors for KRAS-mutant tumors
-Standard chemotherapy for advanced disease
-Targeted therapy combinations promising.

Differential Diagnosis

Similar Entities:
-Cervical mesonephric carcinoma
-Endometrioid carcinoma (tubular variant)
-Clear cell carcinoma
-Serous carcinoma
-Metastatic adenocarcinoma (renal, lung)
-Sex cord-stromal tumor.
Distinguishing Features:
-Endometrial mesonephric: GATA3 positive
-Endometrial mesonephric: PAX8 negative
-Endometrial mesonephric: Location in endometrium
-Cervical mesonephric: Cervical location
-Cervical mesonephric: Associated mesonephric remnants
-Endometrioid: PAX8 positive
-Endometrioid: ER/PR positive
-Clear cell: HNF-1β positive
-Clear cell: Clear cytoplasm.
Diagnostic Challenges:
-Distinguishing from cervical mesonephric carcinoma
-Separating from endometrioid carcinoma variants
-Excluding metastatic adenocarcinoma
-Recognizing rare morphological patterns
-Immunohistochemical confirmation essential
-Molecular testing may be needed.
Rare Variants:
-Solid variant
-Papillary variant
-Retiform variant
-Mixed patterns
-Spindle cell areas
-Sex cord-like differentiation.

Sample Pathology Report

Template Format

Sample Pathology Report

Complete Report: This is an example of how the final pathology report should be structured for this condition.

Specimen Information

Hysterectomy specimen measuring [X x Y x Z] cm, weighing [X] grams

Diagnosis

Endometrial mesonephric carcinoma (mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma)

Classification

WHO Classification: Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma, FIGO Grade: High-grade

Histological Features

Small tubular glands with cuboidal epithelium and eosinophilic secretions

Morphological Pattern

[Tubular/solid/mixed] pattern with mesonephric-like features

Size and Extent

Tumor size: [X] cm, myometrial invasion: [depth/total thickness], [percent]%

Margins

Margins: [involved/uninvolved], closest margin: [X] mm

Lymphovascular Invasion

Lymphovascular invasion: [present/absent]

Cervical Involvement

Cervical involvement: [present/absent]

Special Studies

IHC: GATA3: [positive], PAX8: [negative], TTF-1: [result], ER/PR: [negative]

Molecular studies: KRAS: [result], PIK3CA: [result] (if performed)

Molecular Features

Molecular alterations: [list if performed], consistent with mesonephric-like carcinoma

FIGO Staging

FIGO Stage: [stage] ([staging criteria])

Prognostic Factors

High-grade tumor with aggressive behavior, Stage: [X]

Final Diagnosis

Endometrial mesonephric carcinoma (mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma), FIGO Stage [X]