Definition/General

Introduction:
-Ovarian mucinous carcinoma is a rare epithelial tumor of the ovary
-It accounts for 3-5% of all ovarian cancers
-It arises from ovarian surface epithelium with mucinous differentiation
-It demonstrates glandular architecture with mucin production.
Origin:
-Originates from ovarian surface epithelium or inclusions cysts
-May arise from pre-existing mucinous cystadenoma or borderline tumor
-The neoplastic transformation involves KRAS mutations commonly
-It progresses through adenoma-borderline-carcinoma sequence
-Primary ovarian origin must be distinguished from metastatic mucinous carcinoma.
Classification:
-Classified as intestinal type (most common) or endocervical type
-Intestinal type resembles colorectal adenocarcinoma
-Endocervical type resembles cervical adenocarcinoma
-Primary vs metastatic distinction crucial
-FIGO grading system used (Grade 1-3).
Epidemiology:
-Peak incidence in 4th-5th decades (younger than serous)
-Risk factors less well defined
-No association with BRCA mutations
-More common in Asian populations
-Better prognosis than serous carcinoma when truly primary
-Indian population shows relatively higher incidence compared to Western countries.

Clinical Features

Presentation:
-Unilateral pelvic mass (80-90% cases)
-Abdominal distension due to large tumor size
-Pelvic pain or pressure
-CA-125 often normal or mildly elevated
-CEA may be elevated
-Usually presents at early stage (I-II).
Symptoms:
-Abdominal fullness and discomfort (70% cases)
-Urinary symptoms due to mass effect (40% cases)
-Change in bowel habits (30% cases)
-Weight gain due to tumor mass
-Rarely presents with acute abdomen (torsion, rupture)
-Constitutional symptoms uncommon.
Risk Factors:
-Age 40-60 years (peak incidence)
-No clear hereditary pattern
-Possible association with smoking
-Nulliparity (weak association)
-No BRCA association
-Previous ovarian cysts (theoretical risk).
Screening:
-No specific screening available
-CA-125 not reliable (often normal)
-CEA, CA 19-9 may be elevated
-Imaging shows complex cystic mass
-Frozen section important for intraoperative diagnosis.

Master Mucinous Carcinoma Pathology with RxDx

Access 100+ pathology videos and expert guidance with the RxDx app

Gross Description

Appearance:
-Large, multilocular cystic mass with thick viscous mucin
-Unilateral in 80-90% cases
-Smooth external surface (if confined to ovary)
-Cut surface shows mucin-filled cysts
-Areas of solid nodules suggest invasive component.
Characteristics:
-Gray-white to tan solid areas
-Gelatinous mucin fills cyst cavities
-Thick cyst walls with papillary projections
-Necrosis in high-grade tumors
-Calcifications uncommon.
Size Location:
-Usually very large (10-30 cm, can be >40 cm)
-Unilateral in majority of cases
-Right ovary slightly more common
-Bilateral involvement suggests metastatic disease
-Surface involvement may indicate spread.
Multifocality:
-Usually unifocal when primary
-Bilateral disease raises suspicion for metastases
-Peritoneal implants uncommon in early-stage primary
-Pseudomyxoma peritonei rare complication
-Appendiceal primary must be excluded if bilateral.

Microscopic Description

Histological Features:
-Glandular architecture with mucin-containing cells
-Intestinal type shows goblet cells and Paneth cells
-Cribriform pattern common
-Mucin lakes with floating tumor cells
-Desmoplastic stroma in invasive areas.
Cellular Characteristics:
-Epithelial cells with abundant intracytoplasmic mucin
-Goblet cell morphology (intestinal type)
-Nuclear pleomorphism varies with grade
-Prominent nucleoli in high-grade tumors
-Mitotic activity correlates with grade.
Architectural Patterns:
-Glandular pattern predominant
-Villoglandular pattern
-Solid pattern (high-grade areas)
-Signet ring cell pattern (rare)
-Micropapillary pattern (associated with poor prognosis).
Grading Criteria:
-Three-tier grading system: Grade 1 (well-differentiated, <5% solid areas)
-Grade 2 (moderately differentiated, 5-50% solid areas)
-Grade 3 (poorly differentiated, >50% solid areas)
-Nuclear grade and mitotic activity also considered.

Immunohistochemistry

Positive Markers:
-CK7 (variable, 50-70%)
-CK20 (positive, 80-90%)
-CDX2 (positive, intestinal type)
-CEA (positive)
-CA 19-9 (positive)
-MUC2 (intestinal type)
-Villin (intestinal type).
Negative Markers:
-PAX8 (negative or weak)
-WT1 (negative)
-p53 (wild-type pattern)
-ER/PR (negative)
-Inhibin (negative)
-Calretinin (negative).
Diagnostic Utility:
-Essential for distinguishing from metastatic colorectal carcinoma
-CK7+/CK20+ pattern supports ovarian primary
-PAX8 negativity distinguishes from other ovarian carcinomas
-CDX2 positivity indicates intestinal differentiation
-Profile helps exclude appendiceal primary.
Molecular Subtypes:
-Intestinal type (CK20+, CDX2+, MUC2+)
-Endocervical type (CK7+, MUC6+)
-KRAS-mutated subtype (better prognosis)
-Microsatellite stable (majority).

Molecular/Genetic

Genetic Mutations:
-KRAS mutations (60-70% cases)
-TP53 mutations (less common than serous)
-PIK3CA mutations (20-30%)
-ARID1A mutations (10-20%)
-BRAF mutations (rare)
-APC mutations (rare).
Molecular Markers:
-KRAS overexpression
-p53 wild-type pattern (majority)
-β-catenin membranous staining
-MSI testing usually stable
-HER2 amplification rare
-PD-L1 expression variable.
Prognostic Significance:
-KRAS mutations associated with better prognosis
-p53 wild-type indicates better outcome
-Grade most important prognostic factor
-Stage at presentation crucial
-Bilateral disease suggests poor prognosis.
Therapeutic Targets:
-Limited targeted options compared to serous carcinoma
-MEK inhibitors (KRAS-mutated cases, investigational)
-Anti-angiogenic agents
-Immunotherapy (limited efficacy)
-Conventional chemotherapy mainstay.

Differential Diagnosis

Similar Entities:
-Metastatic colorectal carcinoma (most important differential)
-Metastatic appendiceal carcinoma
-Metastatic pancreatic carcinoma
-Mucinous borderline tumor
-Endometrioid carcinoma with mucinous features.
Distinguishing Features:
-Primary ovarian: Unilateral, large size, CK7+
-Metastatic colorectal: bilateral, smaller, CK7-, better CDX2 expression
-Metastatic appendiceal: pseudomyxoma peritonei pattern
-Borderline: no stromal invasion
-Endometrioid: PAX8+, squamous elements.
Diagnostic Challenges:
-Distinguishing primary from metastatic mucinous carcinoma
-Identifying occult appendiceal primary
-Assessing stromal invasion in borderline areas
-Frozen section limitations
-Bilateral disease significance.
Rare Variants:
-Mucinous carcinoma with anaplastic features
-Mucinous carcinoma with sarcomatoid features
-Mucinous carcinoma with signet ring cells
-Mucinous carcinoma with neuroendocrine features.

Sample Pathology Report

Template Format

Sample Pathology Report

Complete Report: This is an example of how the final pathology report should be structured for this condition.

Specimen Information

[laterality] salpingo-oophorectomy, measuring [size] cm

Diagnosis

Mucinous carcinoma, [intestinal/endocervical] type

Classification and Grade

Primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma, FIGO Grade [1/2/3]

Histological Features

Shows glandular architecture with mucin-containing cells and [specific features]

Size and Extent

Tumor size: [X] cm, [unilateral/bilateral], FIGO Stage: [stage]

Lymphovascular Invasion

Lymphovascular invasion: [present/absent]

Lymph Node Status

Pelvic lymph nodes: [X] negative out of [X] examined

Special Studies

IHC: CK7 ([result]), CK20 (+), CDX2 (+), PAX8 (-), CEA (+)

Molecular: KRAS [result] if performed

Primary vs metastatic assessment: Favors primary ovarian origin

Prognostic Factors

Grade: [1/2/3]; Stage: [FIGO stage]; Laterality: [unilateral/bilateral]

Final Diagnosis

Primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma, [intestinal/endocervical] type, FIGO Grade [X], Stage [X]